AG, are you really suggesting playing two rep players in their best positions rather than picking a schoolboy that you've never actually seen play?



Lunacy.

Yes I think he's found his true vocation now.



No coincidence, for me, that the winning run has developed in his absence. I do hope no one on the coaching staff if contemplating shifting Zak to accomodate him at Wembley.

You don't think playing easier games is a bit more of a coincidence?

Quite. The opposition post Warrington (bar the semi) have had more to do with our resurgence in form than Webb's absence.



The run of fxitures at that time was just what the Doctor ordered.

I think we're being a bit too premature writing Webb off. I think he still has a big role to play until the end of the season.

Webb should come in at halfback. He was pretty much playing halfback ball-in-hand anyway before his injury, and people seem to have forgotten that during that time he created most of our tries.

Fullbacks these days seem to do a lot of stuff that used to be the domain of a 6. That might be me mis-remembering my youth, but in attack your modern fullback seems to be more like a halfback with a bit more freedom as to when they appear in the line.