He brings experience, yes. I'll reserve judgement on the rest until I have seen him play for us week in, week out.





And you saw Manu when he was in the u20s did you? Because you would need to, to know what to look for because at that level we are talking more about potential, about basic skills that could grow, than what you see in a 32 year old who has played in the NRL.



I was happy with the way Dixon was developing at the start of the season. He was looking a much, much better player than for most of last season. If he was able to progress that much in the off season, who knows what he could have been producing in another season or two? And who knows what could be brought out of other young players showing potential? That's my

But we're not comparing this nameless "young local guy" with "U20 Manu" because we're not signing "U20 Manu". That's an entirely different debate.



By that rationale, we should never sign anyone in case some unearthed (and unidentied) diamond might, at some unspecified point in time, be as good.



I'll ask again... who would you prefer in our current squads to Manu, and what he brings to the table now?

Saints are you kidding me ability!. Manu is AWESOME, we have no backrowers in the academy who can do what he does, in fact there are very few back rowers in the whole of SL who can do what he does. That is why Hull FC wanted him, Leeds wanted him and we wanted him.



I love having local players but I want them to take that spot on merit.



I can't understand why you would argue against signing such a good player. When we signed Newlove, we had to let 3 local lads go, plus a ton of cash for that little gem. We already had a good local centre who could kick goals, but he was replaced with a non-kicking awesome centre.



Flannery has retired and Dixon will have to go to make room for Manu but the 2 combined do not offer what Manu does on his own, seriously combine their stats and see if it works out better. Just watching Manu you can see he is a creative force for Hull.



I did not even think it would be possible to shift him from Hull as he is that good.



It's a very good signing the only risk at all is injury from age and that is not a thing you can calculate, look at Eastmond, Wheeler, both young lads with an injury record in their first few years that Manu would struggle to hit over the whole of his career. I think someone posted he has missed 3 games in 3 years. On a 2 year contract it's low risk high reward signing. (bearing in mind the salary cap).

I disagree. It is ridiculous to compare a young player fresh into the first team (or not even in there yet but showing potential in the u20s) with a player who has been around for God knows how long and played for NRL teams in the process. Just plain daft. In order to know what to look for in a 'Manu type player' you would have to know what he was like as a young player himself because that is what any potential young player of ours would look like (or be similar to).

I guess it's a question of where your priorities lie. He could be naff for us, you do know that don't you? He may shine like a beacon in the night for Hull but then do a Perry on us. After all, we are now likely to be his retirement club.



My issue is not with his talent or commitment. My issue is with what we are doing in signing an ageing import as opposed to working with the young talent that we have. I notice Wigan didn't go for him. I wonder why not.

They have Hock who provides their offloading and tackle busts. They do not require a player of that type, but they are losing halfbacks left right and centre. Hence why they are busy trying to snap up any half going.

Someone who has talent, someone who is English and someone who is considerably younger.



I would like to have seen how Dixon would have developed. He did amazing things with his game in the off season. Who knows what he would have developed into within the next season or two? It would have been great to see.



But that is because I am a fan of developing our own talent or English talent at least, rather than buying in ageing imports (or indeed any imports).

Hock is younger than Manu.



Leneghan has also stated an aim to have a wholely British team within three years. Given the way they have brought on their young forwards, I'm leaning towards believing him. I never thought I would respect Wigan for their recruitment but if they follow that through I will end up doing so.



I'll have to take a shower afterwards though.

Hang on. We weren't debating whether someone in the U20s or academy might (having been around for god knows how long and played NRL) eventually become a Manu type player. You're goalpost switching.



We've signed Manu, to play for us next year and the year after. You've said you don't agree with the signing as you'd prefer a "young local lad" to do the job instead. Not "do the job, maybe, in ten years" but "do it, on the pitch, next year". Because that's what we've signed Manu to do.

What 'amazing things' did Dixon do in the off-season?!



He, to me anyway, looks like a slightly better version than Ashurst.

You would not have liked Daniel Anderson. 6 overseas imports in the 2007 GF.



Matthew Gidley

Willie Talau

Francis Meli

Jason Cayless

Chris Flannery

Maurie Fa'asavalu

Great signing, regardless of what the know nowts might say about us having someone is the academy who could do an equally good job (s).



We could probably sign Greg Inglis and they would say the same, but then they've probably only been watching Saints for about 6 years so don't understand that you need to sign good players to be successful.