I'd be quite peeved if Bradford signed Raynor, too much baggage and bound to have an unsettling influence at a time when all seems rather positive. Needed like a second ar$ehole IMO.

There was also [url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2008/jul/28/hullfcrl.superleaguethis[/url.



I would rather have Sheriffe, he's not the best player but he has protential, doesnt have baggage, not injury prone and still young.

Sheriffe wasn't half bad at London and if he can regain some form and sort himself out defensively then he isn't too bad.

He's not good enough never will be.

I think you know thats a bit harsh. He's never going to be word class, granted, but I think he can be decent enough (Leeds home) but that needs to be consistent, and lets face it, he won't be on a massive contract either.

I agree with RER on this, Sheriffe is never going to be good enough for a top team. I really don't see this "potential" that people keep saying he's got.



Every team has to have the odd average player though in order to pay the top ones a decent wage.

I thought in law people were innocent until proved guilty ?

In law they are. In reality, it's not always that difficult to see if someone is guilty or not before it goes to court. (Not that I'm saying he is, as I don't know the facts - Just that Hull may well do!)

hE just looks guilty.

That does not make his point any less valid though does it? He stated, correctly, that Raynor was an EX-GB international.



FWIW, I would take Raynor quite happily because anyone is better than Sheriffe on the wing who is quite clearly rubbish and not good enough for us. Baggage was not an issue when we went for Bird and re-signed Reardon so I do not see this being a major issue at the moment for the club.

Now the pedant in me . . . .





Get your boots ME, you're playing

It is presumed in law a person is innocent until proved guilty, so are you saying Hull fc are pre judging him ?