In which case I apologise.



And to Guru's Beard: I wasn't trying to lead your behaviour in any way, merely making an observation and then voicing my opinion. I find your suggestion I am a current board member masquerading as someone else a touch insulting but short of offering my full name and legal documents I wouldn't be able to fully satisfy you. In any case, I'm not bothered who you think I am.

Lovely.



So, back to it, what are McDermotts faults in relation to the great Mick Potter?

Gurus. I haven't been involved in the whole London players debate here, but I would appreciate if you could answer a question as I'm intrigued.



Who, IN YOUR OPINION (i.e. Google is useless here unless you have a blog it will show up) do you think is a London player that has been brought through with "real talent"?



I'd be interested to know who you are referring to.

Do the research yourself. When you get home and can use Google. Or the internet in general.

I'm not asking who other people think are real talent. I want YOUR OPINION. That's not on Google or the internet as far as I can see. Unless you can provide a link where you have expressed this?

He doesnt know, thats why he wont answer.

He'll probably come up with some joker like Jamie O'Callaghan or that Olsi kid.

Love what you did there, the old "he won't answer but he will" bit. Clever. No, really.



You still looking to see when Greg Eastwood was injured in your continually flawed research?

another on the foe list

Why wont you answer it?



Nah Im not looking at that anymore.

It wasn't a rhetorical question. The question was "In YOUR opinion, who are these players that YOU have been referring with real talent that BM brought through at London?"



Now, the only real reason I'm getting involved is that it looks to me that you've typed without using your brain and that you don't really have an player to name to back up your argument and as you chose to try and divert away from this by being y to people.

Same here.



Utterly pointless reading anyway so I don't think it will be a big miss!

Bold letters, that makes it all the more salient. Admirable.



Unlike your clear inability to do the analysis yourself.