The team finishing top would have three weeks between games, they'd be undercooked.



Not simple.



Top 5 is the ideal system, there is the issue of dead rubber games outside of that though.

I would like a return of [ifirst past the post[/i - imagine all the title chases of the past 16 seasons we could have had. Why on earth anyone would want to sacrifice an entire seasons worth of fixtures for 4 weeks of utter contrivance is beyond me.



If we're basing our competition of making mediocre teams feel "involved", then god help us.

So we should change the system based on the first exciting last day to a PL season in years?



Personally I would change the format of the play-offs and reduce the amount of teams to 5 or 6 but to scrap them all together? Nah. Personally I'd rather see a play-off system brought into the Premire League.

I think we need to keep the play-offs, but would agree that top 8 is a nonsense. This should be reduced to an absolute maximum of 5, in my opinion.

The champions should be the league winners, yet the powers that be refer to Leeds as 'champions'. I can't wait for a GF with the 7th & 8th team contesting it.

Yet again why 'should' they be? It's been said about 1000 times but everyone knows what is considered the most prestigious to win before the season starts, it's not like they suddenly announced the play off system after the league was finished.

Because for many people there needs to be a firm, definitive link between success in the season and being crowned champions. While I wouldn't go so far as removing the playoffs altogether I would agree with many others that they need to be reduced so that the title of champions is not dissonant with the actual success they have had.



Personally I like the playoffs (as a concept, at least) because they require a team to be successful in [iboth [/ia league and an end of season knock-out, rather than just one or the other. Unfortunately the current incarnation of the playoffs means that a team actually [idoesn't[/i have to successful at both; they can in fact experience more failure than success in the league element but be crowned champions because they succeed in the knock-out element. To me that's not what the term "champion" represents.

I'm sorry, but anyone arguing that we should bring back the first-past-the-post system based on this season's PL finish is deluded!



Not every season finishes with quite the same bang? Really? I'll tell you now, it'll probably never ever happen like that ever again. It was a one off. It would be like a team winning the GF in the way Catalan beat Saints earlier this year.



How many PL titles have been won before the last game of the year? A lot.

Fortunately for them, there are the Champions League places to play for as well as the Europa League, then there's also the relegation battle. There is something happening all over the league.



You can't replicate that in RL. We don't have a European competition. We don't have relegation. If we have first-past-the-post system, the majority of the league won't be playing for anything. And the majority of seasons will end on a damp squib.

It's a tricky balance to get right this one..



If you brought back relegation based on performance then teams would go back to packing their squads with cheap and average Aussies...the youth that is being given a chance now would remain in the U20's or go and play in the lower leagues and be lost.



If you cut the top 8 down to say top 4 (like they have in RU) then although the play off matches would be harder to call and crowds would increase....you'd have 10 teams with nothing to do. It's not like we have a strong European competition that places 5 - 8 can aim to qualify for.. teams would have nothing to play for in the last 3/4 rounds if they don't sit on the edge of the 4th position.



Personally think that it should be the Top 5 or 7 and scrap the coaches call rubbish.



The League Leaders Shield should also have far more importance...as mentioned by others, the team that have played the best all year WILL finish top...so they should in my opinion go straight to the GF...with the remaining 4 or 6 teams (depending on whether its a Top 5 or Top 7 system) involved in a play off system to reach the final. That way far more importance can be placed on the effort of finishing in 1st position.



I'd also like to see the WCC extended....but slowly. No rushing into a huge 8 team competition just yet. I'd have the two finalists from each competition play on a single day...runners up in each final play each other at say 3pm and then 6pm is the main event with the two champions.

1 For every year the association football title is decided on the last day, there are 19 years when it's decided weeks beforehand.



2) So yes, Sunday's football was exciting - but it's the excitement that comes once every blue moon, most of the time, the final rounds see teams with "nothing to play for" to use the preferred phrase of this board.



3) Play-offs aren'tan NRL tradition - they're a rugby league tradition. It's how the champions have nearly always been decided: from1 1895 to 1973 and from 1998 to present. The 25 years that the title was awarded to the team who finished top of the table after the 'regular season' were the aberration and the break with traditions - and the clubs only agreed to it if the RFL agreed to a post season 'premiership' to make up for the lost play-off games.



4) I'm sorry Warrington couldn't take their 'minor premier' form into the play-offs last year, but that's the rules of the competition you entered. Frankly you're still building from the days when you were just crap - take the achievement you managed last year. Personally, as a Cas fan, I'd be happy with topping the league, even if we didn't win the title. It's a step in the right direction.

I'd like to see less teams in the playoffs, I think it really devalues the competition when more than half of the league is in it. It should be the top 6 at the very very most.



I'd also like to see more recognition for the league leaders because it's much more of an achievement that winning a few games in a knockout competition.

How? They get a trophy, despite not being champions, atm - how would give them more recognition?





... actually, just read Hear Ye's post above







That's an interesting idea (subject to whether it's an advantage or disadvantage to wait 2, 3 or 4 weeks between you last league game and the title game)