Quote Saddened!="Saddened!"Tomkins was complete rubbish. Habana is miles better as is the Aussie winger. Some very good players on show in the game, much more impressive athletes than you see in league these days.
Tomkins has his work cut out to prepare for his move to Union. At the moment he's not up to international rugby Union.'"
Finally, a voice of reason.
Despite the subpar basic skills in relation to League, Rugby backs if anything are immense athletes. I really don't think too many out and out League fans realise just how good the best Rugby players are, strictly from an athletic stand point. There's tons of ing gun backs in Rugby. There's hundreds of wingers, centres and fullbacks who athletically are as good as our best, with many putting ours to shame.
If League teams had a raised cap - above that of Rugby to the point you could entice some ruggers - you could bet your that League clubs would be raiding the out of Rugby. NZ in particular have some ANIMALS.
Anyone saying Tomkins shouldn't have been played on the wing also imo are kidding themselves. Tomkins outside of Freuan was the ing best place for him, because Freuan will break the line for fun. The right side was obviously the strongest.
It's infuriating to me that Rugby has so many phenomenal athletes in the backline and even in the forwards these days(thinking of the modern day number 8's), because if they were bred into League they'd be stars. No question. English League in particular has real problems breeding freak athletes, even compared to Aus and NZ League players, who are in many ways inferior to Rugby players, at least in the backline.
Your Freuans, Rangers, Toevas, Gears, Habanas, Chavangas, Tuilagis, even your Ojo's and Monyes would tear it up.
I have no ing idea why the book wasn't thrown at someone like Hosea Gear a few years back. Even today the NRL should be trying to steal players like Freuan and Ranger. The game might not be all that but there's some ridiculous athletes in Rugby.