|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/021f8/021f8b4be76143f2354cf9b9d249b99d1966a826" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1733 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2009 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote D.D.="D.D."Thanks to Craig Spence of the RFL, we've got this one all tied up
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi David,
We have a press release on the very subject due out next week.
The two winners in Week 1 cannot play each other in Week 3. Therefore Saints would not be able to choose Leeds proving both win in Week 1. The winning team from Week 1 with the highest league ranking can only choose from the winners of week 2.
If Saints were to win in week 1 and Leeds lose, then Saints could decide to pick them.
On current league placings if HKR were to beat Saints and then play each other in Week 3 then HKR would have home advantage.
Hope this helps
Craig'" this is a great poster data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbfa5/bbfa5fc2059ec2d9f2e4b15ea06c1f7fd6936a17" alt="Wink icon_wink.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6767 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Trying to explain the play offs to a few non rugby supporters they were not impressed. One guy said if they applied this to a tennis final, you would have a 5 set final, one competitor winning the first 3 sets then the competion organizer says play off another final set winner takes all.
If all the home teams in the play offs win there 1st round games, the home teams win there 2nd round games. Would Leeds and St Helens have to beat Huddersfield and Hull KR twice, if so isn,t once enough.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 956 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It would have been better to have the winners of the games between 1v4 and 2v3 play each other in week three, with the winner going to the GF and the loser playing against the winner of the other week three game (between the week two winners) in week four.
That way all of the top 4 are guaranteed a second bite of the cherry and there isn't anyone choosing opponents, which a lot of people are having trouble understanding.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1733 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2009 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Red Red Robin="Red Red Robin"It would have been better to have the winners of the games between 1v4 and 2v3 play each other in week three, with the winner going to the GF and the loser playing against the winner of the other week three game (between the week two winners) in week four.
That way all of the top 4 are guaranteed a second bite of the cherry and there isn't anyone choosing opponents, which a lot of people are having trouble understanding.'" remember the top 5 semi's. the minor prems would have the 1st week off 2nd vs 3rd, 4th vs 5th data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbfa5/bbfa5fc2059ec2d9f2e4b15ea06c1f7fd6936a17" alt="Wink icon_wink.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 8627 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| my biggest issue with the new system is that even if Leeds and Saints win this weekend, they then can lose to the same teams in 2 weeks and miss out on the final. There is no real benefit to finishing higher up the league.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1290 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2016 | Apr 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote saints35 bulls0="saints35 bulls0" There is no real benefit to finishing higher up the league.'"
Except that the top four get two chances, the winners in the first week from the top four get a week off, and those finishing higher in the league play at home. No benefit at all, really.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 321 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2016 | Feb 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It could end up with Leeds choosing HKR again and Saints having to play Hudds again in games g and h (i.e. a repeat of the first week matches) with the winners to the Grand Final!!!!
Week 1
a) Leeds v HKR
b) Saints v Hudds
c) Wakey v Catalans
d) Wigan v Cas
Week 2
e) Hudds v Wigan
f) HKR v Wakey
Week 3
g) Leeds v HKR
h) Saints v Hudds
GF - Leeds v Saints
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 10446 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Jul 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Hugh Mann="Hugh Mann"It could end up with Leeds choosing HKR again and Saints having to play Hudds again in games g and h (i.e. a repeat of the first week matches) with the winners to the Grand Final!!!!
Week 1
a) Leeds v HKR
b) Saints v Hudds
c) Wakey v Catalans
d) Wigan v Cas
Week 2
e) Hudds v Wigan
f) HKR v Wakey
Week 3
g) Leeds v HKR
h) Saints v Hudds
GF - Leeds v Saints'"
I thought they were not allowed to chose the team they have already played or is it that they cannot pick the other winner in WK1?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 8627 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Wadski="Wadski"I thought they were not allowed to chose the team they have already played or is it that they cannot pick the other winner in WK1?'"
the top ranked team in the semi cannot choose the 2nd rank team in the semi - i.e. the other winner from week 1.
IMO Leeds will have the choice of playing Saints or Hull KR in the semi final - and will choose to play Saints, leaving Hull KR and Hudds to battle it out for the other GF spot.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 321 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2016 | Feb 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It says that Highest ranked winner from matches a / b can choose a team of their choice from the winners of e / f. The lowest ranked winner of a / b plays the other winner from e / f.
So if Leeds and Saints both win and Hudds and HKR win their second games, Leeds could choose to play HKR again leaving Saints to play Hudds again.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 12006 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2019 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Explained totally different on Boots n All though
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/021f8/021f8b4be76143f2354cf9b9d249b99d1966a826" alt="" |
|