No I don't I would hazard a guess that the rent at the ground assuming all sides are open each game would be around estimated 10 k per match, I base this on knowing what we paid for LSV when running Ian Watson's testimonial game late last year. However loan charges and other costs may well swell that amount, clearly as the details are being kept under wraps it won't be broadcast as to how much rent was missed unless of course it was listed in the CVA.

Did we really need to rehash this done-to-death subject in yet another thread?

Agree with the Butcher, as I have tried to say, nowt to do with us.

But Bill it is to do with Salford, they didn't pay for the facilities they were renting. Had they done so then perhaps the Stadium Company wouldn't need top up funds.

The last regime as got a lot to answer for and that's a fact.

Could I suggest you look forwards rather than backwards.

I think everyone knows full well what a mess the business was in - what's the point of labouring it ?

Think if you look some of the old regimes detractors have disappeared since the Doctor took over and then in last couple of weeks or so there seems to be more and more newer posters bringing up the past.



Coincidence?

All this talk of old regime look forward not back its not us etc does you little credit it was your club after all not some faceless corporate enterprise who's inadequacies are still being felt it would seem and that can't be right?



I seem to recall that on a recent thread posters were advocating that the 'good' doctor should use th past to his advantage in bidding to buy Barton business is business after all How can that be right when your club was part of the malaise? Oh I'm sorry it was the old regime



At this tme when you as a club have looked back and chosen to change names to incorporate Red Devils recognising your heritage perhaps in future years rebranding as Cowboys might be more appropriate?

Aren't most if the monies owed being paid back via the cva? Which would explain the 'don't look back' comments.



Rico, you seem.to have a massive chip on your shoulder regarding Salford, as seen with your snide comments regarding the city of Salford/Swinton on the wire forum. Not sure why this is?

If ou was owed money in that CVA and you needed it now hoe would you feel about waiting five years to recover what is rightly yours.?

A whole lot better than I would have done if the club had gone under, with all prospects of getting anything all gone with it.

You do know what the V stands for aye?

You do know the moral side of one don't you, you know the bit where the voluntary bit is forced on the creditor but really in the five years it takes to be repaid untold damage could be done to that creditors business since his cash flow projections are no longer viable in his business model so he looks to perhaps shrink his business using redundancies maybe.

That's the harsh reality of V.

Pretty rich banging on about morals when you come on here bleating about redundancies just to score points against rival fans mate. Welcome to capitalism though - can be pretty harsh eh? Bearing in mind that the other option was that creditors received absolutely nothing, ever, how would this scenario have played out in the Peoples Democratic Republic of Swinton?