Tomkins has won a Grand Final and a Challenge Cup and played vital roles in both. I'd say Radlinski is the better all round full back but Tomkins the better player. Tomkins can win a game on his own for us the way no other SL era Wigan player could, he's already a great player, and I expect him to become world-class in the NRL. I'd love to see what he could have done behind the pack we had in '01 either at full back or playing stand off next to Adrian Lam

I disagree I think Radders should be full back 100%

I disagree I think Radders should be full back 100%

Trophies do not a great player make.



I refer you to Ricky Bibey.



Though Sam has got the MoS....



As for caps, he's already got a few of those.



Sam may go on to do many great things in Oz, but he is already a great player. He is so much better than the other players in SL that if I'm wrong and Sam isn't a great player then things in SL are even more worrying than I feared.

Are you mad? A team without Boston?! You must be too far up Ged's ladders to see the mistake in the team you've made

As I have already mentioned previously, no doubt Boston was a great player but I am too young to have seen him play!!

They do when referring to players like Edwards and Gregory.

If there was a tackle needing to be made by a full back then Radlinski would be the only full back that I would want making it.



However, in attack Sam is without a shadow of a doubt the most gifted and entertaining full back that I have ever seen in a Wigan shirt.



For that reason he has to be in.

Not really.





Edwards was a talent, but in the right place, right time? Never did cut it Internationally, but was that his fault? Jury is out.



Gregory.....interesting but wouldn't make the reserves today. Far too unfit.



Fantastic player though and I for one am glad that I saw him play. Overall out of the two I would have Edwards in my team for his professionalism and determination.



Kenny has to be the most complete 6 to play for us. Anyone who can seriously talked about in comparison to Wally Lewis has to be up there.



Dean Bell would be one of the first names on the team sheet. Individual talent notwithstanding, the guy was a legend. My probable captain.



So that leaves 1 centre spot. Who to pick? Miles? Connoly? Renouf? Inga? Very difficult, almost impossible.



Wingers have to be Offiah and Robinson. Never saw Boston but he would probably not be able to live with the pace of Offiah, nor have the ability to hit the gaps like Robinson. I'm sure he had other qualities....





So that leaves us with



Sam

Robinson

Bell

?

Offiah

Edwards

Kenny





Forwards? Again very difficult as we have had a lot.



Platt would have to be there for his consistency and applicaiton

Hooker? The heart rembers Dermott but the head may choose McCormack

Then choose one from many



Farrell would be a second row as would Goodway, leaving Hanley as 13.

Seems to be the one thing that everyone is agreeing with.

how can you put edwards at 6 before brett kenny ludicrous... and john ferguson has to be on the wing my 13 would be



1. kris radlinski

2. john ferguson

3. gene miles

4. dean bell

5. billy boston

6. brett kenny

7. andy gregory

8. andy platt

9. nicky kiss

10. greg dowling

11. andy goodway

12. andy farrell

12. ellery hanley



subs



1. sam tomkins

2. sean o`loughlin

3. brian mctigue

4. sean edwards

brett kenny won wigan loads of matches single handedly... without him on the field at wembley in 85 we would have lost....

so gifted could read an opposing teams play like a book......

brilliant brilliant player i would even say better than wally lewis.....



i still think that even now there is no one who could touch him at stand off....



if you could take the kenny we had who was in his prime and play him today he would still bamboozle defences.....