good luck to them if they have managed to do this without having to sell but I'd be concerned if I was Carter and it cost us a place for the season after

It does make you wonder doesn't it; if Bradford, having been helped beyond the wildest dreams of any other club, manage to scrape through this season and avoid the drop, we could have a genuine grievance. As far as I'm aware, we were prevented from signing players in the off-season until our financial future was secured (by Messrs Carter and Brereton's mortgages) and although we had an advance of Sky money, it is to be repaid.

Quote bren2k="bren2k"icon_lol.gif Exactly the same thing we've had to post numerous times in response to largely the same stuff directed at us; people tend to see the figure, their eyes gloss over and they assume it's a debt - repeat it a few times and before you know it, the received wisdom is that x club is y 00's of 000's in debt. '" Perhaps Daddycool could explain then, seeing as he's said himself in this article www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... 3/2013/10/ : "are still things coming out of the woodwork, but we have paid a large chunk of the debts we inherited." Even your own chairman says debts. In terms of Bradford, the quote about money next season is because they get the full allocation of Sky money - i.e. £600k more.

Quote bren2k="bren2k"icon_lol.gif Exactly the same thing we've had to post numerous times in response to largely the same stuff directed at us; people tend to see the figure, their eyes gloss over and they assume it's a debt - repeat it a few times and before you know it, the received wisdom is that x club is y 00's of 000's in debt. '" Perhaps Daddycool could explain then, seeing as he's said himself in this article www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... 3/2013/10/ : "are still things coming out of the woodwork, but we have paid a large chunk of the debts we inherited." Even your own chairman says debts. In terms of Bradford, the quote about money next season is because they get the full allocation of Sky money - i.e. £600k more.

Quote Fully="Fully"Perhaps Daddycool could explain then, seeing as he's said himself in this article www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... 3/2013/10/ : "are still things coming out of the woodwork, but we have paid a large chunk of the debts we inherited." Even your own chairman says debts. In terms of Bradford, the quote about money next season is because they get the full allocation of Sky money - i.e. £600k more.'" bet you dig graves for a living

Quote Fully="Fully"Perhaps Daddycool could explain then, seeing as he's said himself in this article www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... 3/2013/10/ : "are still things coming out of the woodwork, but we have paid a large chunk of the debts we inherited." Even your own chairman says debts. In terms of Bradford, the quote about money next season is because they get the full allocation of Sky money - i.e. £600k more.'" bet you dig graves for a living

And with a bit of luck chucks himself in one.

Quote Fully="Fully"Perhaps Daddycool could explain then, seeing as he's said himself in this article www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... 3/2013/10/ : "are still things coming out of the woodwork, but we have paid a large chunk of the debts we inherited." Even your own chairman says debts. In terms of Bradford, the quote about money next season is because they get the full allocation of Sky money - i.e. £600k more.'" Here's Comical Ali, gathering intel to re-brand for the nutjob forum! Different issues - the club was under-capitalised for the coming season, hence the sale of some players and the efficiencies in the backroom staff; the debt was discovered as part of that process - hence, it 'came out of the woodwork.' Ok with you?

Quote Fully="Fully"Perhaps Daddycool could explain then, seeing as he's said himself in this article www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... 3/2013/10/ : "are still things coming out of the woodwork, but we have paid a large chunk of the debts we inherited." Even your own chairman says debts. In terms of Bradford, the quote about money next season is because they get the full allocation of Sky money - i.e. £600k more.'" Here's Comical Ali, gathering intel to re-brand for the nutjob forum! Different issues - the club was under-capitalised for the coming season, hence the sale of some players and the efficiencies in the backroom staff; the debt was discovered as part of that process - hence, it 'came out of the woodwork.' Ok with you?

Not going to argue - it's futile when you cannot have a reasonable discussion on here with you Bren. If you prefer to act childish, so be it. However, it has always been mentioned in tandem with debt, as this video also proves www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/23950797 Within first few mins it's said that the club has some immediate and pressing debts left from previous regime that need attention and therefore need £400k. Perhaps it's not meant in that way but all and sundry have reported it as debts and therefore I must question why the club have not bothered to correct this if it is indeed an error. I no doubt expect some other childish response; this hasn't even got anything to do with the other forum. It was a genuine point as to why it's referred to as debt everywhere and, in that sense, you can hardly ridicule people for stating that themselves.

Not going to argue - it's futile when you cannot have a reasonable discussion on here with you Bren. If you prefer to act childish, so be it. However, it has always been mentioned in tandem with debt, as this video also proves www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/23950797 Within first few mins it's said that the club has some immediate and pressing debts left from previous regime that need attention and therefore need £400k. Perhaps it's not meant in that way but all and sundry have reported it as debts and therefore I must question why the club have not bothered to correct this if it is indeed an error. I no doubt expect some other childish response; this hasn't even got anything to do with the other forum. It was a genuine point as to why it's referred to as debt everywhere and, in that sense, you can hardly ridicule people for stating that themselves.

Quote Fully="Fully"Not going to argue - it's futile when you cannot have a reasonable discussion on here with you Bren. If you prefer to act childish, so be it. However, it has always been mentioned in tandem with debt, as this video also proves www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/23950797 Within first few mins it's said that the club has some immediate and pressing debts left from previous regime that need attention and therefore need £400k. Perhaps it's not meant in that way but all and sundry have reported it as debts and therefore I must question why the club have not bothered to correct this if it is indeed an error. I no doubt expect some other childish response; this hasn't even got anything to do with the other forum. It was a genuine point as to why it's referred to as debt everywhere and, in that sense, you can hardly ridicule people for stating that themselves.'" Obsessed that's all WE ARE THE FAMOUS WAKEFIELD TRINITY

Quote Fully="Fully"Not going to argue - it's futile when you cannot have a reasonable discussion on here with you Bren. If you prefer to act childish, so be it. However, it has always been mentioned in tandem with debt, as this video also proves www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/23950797 Within first few mins it's said that the club has some immediate and pressing debts left from previous regime that need attention and therefore need £400k. Perhaps it's not meant in that way but all and sundry have reported it as debts and therefore I must question why the club have not bothered to correct this if it is indeed an error. I no doubt expect some other childish response; this hasn't even got anything to do with the other forum. It was a genuine point as to why it's referred to as debt everywhere and, in that sense, you can hardly ridicule people for stating that themselves.'" Obsessed that's all WE ARE THE FAMOUS WAKEFIELD TRINITY

Quote Fully="Fully"Not going to argue - it's futile when you cannot have a reasonable discussion on here with you Bren. If you prefer to act childish, so be it. However, it has always been mentioned in tandem with debt, as this video also proves www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/23950797 Within first few mins it's said that the club has some immediate and pressing debts left from previous regime that need attention and therefore need £400k. Perhaps it's not meant in that way but all and sundry have reported it as debts and therefore I must question why the club have not bothered to correct this if it is indeed an error. : SLEEPY: I no doubt expect some other childish response; this hasn't even got anything to do with the other forum. It was a genuine point as to why it's referred to as debt everywhere and, in that sense, you can hardly ridicule people for stating that themselves.'"

Quote Fully="Fully"Not going to argue - it's futile when you cannot have a reasonable discussion on here with you Bren. If you prefer to act childish, so be it. However, it has always been mentioned in tandem with debt, as this video also proves www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/23950797 Within first few mins it's said that the club has some immediate and pressing debts left from previous regime that need attention and therefore need £400k. Perhaps it's not meant in that way but all and sundry have reported it as debts and therefore I must question why the club have not bothered to correct this if it is indeed an error. : SLEEPY: I no doubt expect some other childish response; this hasn't even got anything to do with the other forum. It was a genuine point as to why it's referred to as debt everywhere and, in that sense, you can hardly ridicule people for stating that themselves.'"

Bateman? Our most exciting academy prospect. L'estrange, our co captain and probably highest earner? Jamie Langley, again probably our highest earner. Lulia again another top earner. We've also had cuts and redundancies across the whole club.



I think (and hope) things are genuinely different this time. When Khan came in and saved the club (for which i am still grateful) Khan made made a load of noises how the Bulls were back, 2013 was our year etc Similarly as Glover did with yours.



This time the directors stated straight from the off that they had a 400k deficit to make up. They are business men first and foremost and are looking to get the finances in order. I think our situations were pretty similar, both went through bad times, were saved by local enthusiastic local businessmen, things didn't turn out great but no wboth look to be under control with proper business men who won't over spend to get extra twitter followers.



Hope you guys have a good season! As long as you don't finish above us

Quote Fully="Fully"Not going to argue - it's futile when you cannot have a reasonable discussion on here with you Bren. If you prefer to act childish, so be it. However, it has always been mentioned in tandem with debt, as this video also proves www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/23950797 Within first few mins it's said that the club has some immediate and pressing debts left from previous regime that need attention and therefore need £400k. Perhaps it's not meant in that way [ubut all and sundry have reported it as debts[/u and therefore I must question why the club have not bothered to correct this if it is indeed an error. I no doubt expect some other childish response; this hasn't even got anything to do with the other forum. It was a genuine point as to why it's referred to as debt everywhere and, in that sense, you can hardly ridicule people for stating that themselves.'" Did they really?? www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/s ... -1-6003018 www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... 6/8898655/ It seems they above reported it as under capitalised.

Quote Fully="Fully"Not going to argue - it's futile when you cannot have a reasonable discussion on here with you Bren. If you prefer to act childish, so be it. However, it has always been mentioned in tandem with debt, as this video also proves www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/23950797 Within first few mins it's said that the club has some immediate and pressing debts left from previous regime that need attention and therefore need £400k. Perhaps it's not meant in that way [ubut all and sundry have reported it as debts[/u and therefore I must question why the club have not bothered to correct this if it is indeed an error. I no doubt expect some other childish response; this hasn't even got anything to do with the other forum. It was a genuine point as to why it's referred to as debt everywhere and, in that sense, you can hardly ridicule people for stating that themselves.'" Did they really?? www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/s ... -1-6003018 www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... 6/8898655/ It seems they above reported it as under capitalised.

That's just a re-hash of the original statement released on the club site. But since then it's been referred to as debt - both from people at the club - and also in national press. www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby-league ... ants-party www.totalrl.com/web/super-league ... -wildcats/ www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/24940791 But besides that, the point of my comments were to highlight - in response to Bren - that this wasn't something dreamt up by people commenting, more it's just what people are reporting from elsewhere. Either it's debt or it isn't debt.

That's just a re-hash of the original statement released on the club site. But since then it's been referred to as debt - both from people at the club - and also in national press. www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby-league ... ants-party www.totalrl.com/web/super-league ... -wildcats/ www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/24940791 But besides that, the point of my comments were to highlight - in response to Bren - that this wasn't something dreamt up by people commenting, more it's just what people are reporting from elsewhere. Either it's debt or it isn't debt.