Funny how 3 men jury can say that the elbow was accidental and not take it in to account.

Then next day another 3 man jury plus a judge of the land says there was the elbows as provacation.

So why didn't they call Bailey back and give the game justice ?

I`ve looked at this picture loads of times,and I STILL can`t see Radford in it.

Radfords nelt down out of shot pummeling someone on the floor!!

Is he anywhere in this one then?

What exactly is your point?

Only just seen the incident. As soon as I did I had a look at the disciplinary reports. Very, very glad the appeal was successful. He can't let his temper get the better of him in future of course (and I'm sure he won't), but it was good to see Baily get what he deserved nonetheless, and even better to see a victory, of sorts, against Red Hall bias.

Basically, he has no point?

He's trying to prove he's a bigger feck-wit than some of our friends in the east. It has to be said He's performing admirably so far.

I like him. He makes my trolling on the Rovers board look original and multi-faceted.

You're in a different league to him Mrs B.



For someone with nearly 5000 posts he's a pretty poor troll too.

What's up Coddies. Not so funny when it's one of your own getting the cheap shot treatment?

One of our own did get the "cheap shot treatment"



He then gave it back in spades: one punch landed and daft-lad has to go off to get his head stitched