If the last paragraph was redundant why do you respond to the rest of the post. The point was you said Whiting had been better than Yeaman this season and 100% better than Horne, neither of which are true imo.



Anyway moving on, I believe Whiting has been more flexible/realistic with his contract demands so is hopefully likely to get another deal, hope so.

Because I wasn't the one who said that it wasn't worth continuing the discussion, but then decided to continue it anyway.







At least you've managed to get through your head what I was actually saying now. That's a good start.

Check my first post in response to your question.







So I managed to [iget[/i your point from the start, nothing needed to get through.

Then why say:







...when it's patently obvious that I wasn't trying to do anything of the sort?

Due to the fact that the discussion had moved on and became a more general discussion about the two players, or so I thought.

I see. Because I thought that I had put:







And in the very next post you replied:







Whichever way you look at it, however 'general' you thought the discussion had become, at no point did I try to convince you of anything of the sort.

Based on this season's form you said that Whiting had been better than Yeaman, which I disagreed with in my very first reply to you, as I have already indicated. You said an in form Yeaman would be better than Whiting but he had been out of form for 2/3 years, regardless of which I maintained Yeaman was still better even when out of form.



There is really nothing more to say, you think Whiting has been better and I don't.

Get a room you two

I agree. You just need to accept that I'm right and we can all move on.

Are you my wife?

"Hello Dave"

Hi