Do you base your extras quote on facts, inside knowledge, alternative media scources or just your usual bull.

Try reading the rest of the post. If you believe Mason would come here for a flat £110k a year, when Orford is reportedly on more than twice as much, then I'm happy for you.

Putting the salary thing to one side, Mason would be an excellent signing for any side in SL imo.

my money's on option 4 bert.

So you think players only receive a flat basic salary?

I very much doubt all the Rovers players you list are on excess of 110K. Take Webster as an example. It was widely reported he signed for 100K p.a in 2007. I doubt, given his stock has gone down since then, that he got a pay rise to re-sign. More likely to have taken a cut.



Mason is on peanuts at the Cowboys (alledgedly!). All this guff is him and his agent trying to get them to up his contract for 2011. I doubt this story has any credence outside the mind of the HDM Rovers correspondent.



Pommy Journo's, you gotta love 'em!

Peanuts in Oz vs Peanuts in UK. Whats the exchange rate?

There's no need for Rovers fans to worry about what Mason would or would not earn if he signs.



We are near the top end of the cap now and we will be again next season, with or without Willie Mason.



Blake Green plus Willie Mason would not cost a great deal more than Paul Cooke plus Chev Walker who will both be absent from next seasons payroll.

Fair enough. The thing is with the HDM is they describe every senior player at both clubs as on a flat £100k, and I doubt somehow that's the case. I still think Mason will come to England and probably to Rovers, and will be a very good signing.

i dont think he will come and i dont want him, he could be playing games with the alledged three clubs despite todays hdm report but we see next week

why dont you want him? (in the interest of debate)

Is this the same Mason that Peacock flattened?