If Kirk Yeaman or any player had spit at a player of any team and a member of that team reported the incident to the referee I would expect a charge to be brought against him.



I can see nothing on the link to suggest this to be the case and I'm sure the RFL will have investigated it if a complaint had been made by Green and the evidence as suggested was so accurate.

I think it's been a simple misunderstanding. It's patently obvious from the video that he's spitting his dummy (again) but I'm not sure that's an offence.

Well i find it quite hard to believe! i always had Kirky down as more of a swallower then a spitter!

If it was on the white part of Green's shirt though it maybe wouldn't be visable?

Unless Yeaman had a bad cold?

It isn`t, and if Yeaman did spit at Green I can`t see Green just standing there and taking it t.b.h.

He's not going to stand there and have a spitting match is he and Blake is obviously more professional than Yaki yeamo, so he did the right thing reported it to Bentham and what did he do jack that's refs for ya

Wouldn't need to would we? It'd be all over the Hull board like cowardlythug-gate was last year. I did think about adding a question mark to the title, but I think posts have made it pretty clearly implicit.



Storm in a tea-cup, IMO, but it is a talking point.



edit: better to err on the side of caution, I guess.

Aye, you lo have to grasp every opportunity to slate an FC player,

Vive la Similarité

Doesn't Agar publicly slate individual players following a loss? We're not grasping opportunities, just following protocol.